Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 6 results ...
Beran, V and Dlask, P (2007) Nonlinear optimisation and rational cash flow. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 277–92.
Chen, L and Mohamed, S (2007) Empirical study of interactions between knowledge management activities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 242–60.
Chinowsky, P S, Molenaar, K and Bastias, A (2007) Measuring achievement of learning organizations in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 215–27.
Edwards, D J and Holt, G D (2007) Perceptions of workplace vibration hazards among a small sample of UK construction professionals. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 261–76.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Construction industry; hazards; health and safety; United Kingdom; vibration
- ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
- URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09699980710744908
- Abstract:
Purpose – The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations (CVWR) became law in 2005. They are of particular relevance to construction – which by nature of its activities – presents abundant whole-body, and hand-arm, vibration hazards. The principal aim of this research was to assess perceptions among a sample of UK construction professionals; regarding workplace vibration hazards generally and the CVWR specifically. Design/methodology/approach – A structured questionnaire survey was carried out among a small but carefully targeted sample of professionals drawn from construction. These included health and safety managers, production managers and designers. A total of 88 useable responses were received. Data were analysed principally using the mean index technique. Findings – Generally, a realistic view of hazards was observed; although some significant misperceptions were noted. Self-confessed levels of knowledge regarding the subject were typically “low”. This appeared something of a paradox, in that “training workers” was cited as the most commonly used risk control method for both whole-body, and hand-arm vibration risks, respectively. Practical implications – Disparity was observed between what respondents knew about the subject and the purported (extensive) use of training as a risk control method. This indicates that a degree of introspection may be beneficial on the part of employers, regarding their training design and delivery mechanisms. Differences in perceived degrees of vibration risk, exist between health and safety professionals and construction managers; implying that there is a need for improved communication between those responsible for planning vibration management controls, and those charged with implementing them at the workplace. Originality/value – The paper presents research that assess perceptions among a sample of UK construction professionals; regarding workplace vibration hazards generally and the CVWR specifically.
Mohamed, Y, Borrego, D, Francisco, L, Al-Hussein, M, AbouRizk, S and Hermann, U (2007) Simulation-based scheduling of module assembly yards: case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 293–311.
Prasertrungruang, T and Hadikusumo, B H W (2007) Heavy equipment management practices and problems in Thai highway contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(03), 228–41.